A system in which advancement and rewards are based on individual ability, talent, and achievement rather than on class privilege, wealth, or other factors. It emphasizes merit as the basis for success.
Coined in 1958 by British sociologist Michael Young from Latin meritum (merit, desert) + Greek -kratia (rule, power). Young actually intended it as a satirical term in his book 'The Rise of the Meritocracy,' warning against a society obsessed with merit-based selection.
Break it down: MERIT + OCRACY (like democracy, aristocracy). It's rule by merit - the most talented and hardworking people rise to the top. Ironically, the guy who invented this word meant it as a warning, not a goal! He worried that pure meritocracy could become just as unfair as other systems.
Modern meritocracy ideology (1950s onward) emerged in male-dominated institutions and assumes 'merit' is neutral, obscuring how systemic barriers prevent equal access. The premise that success reflects pure ability rather than accumulated advantage has historically excluded women from high-prestige fields.
Use meritocracy critically; acknowledge it as aspirational but flawed. Pair with transparency about structural barriers and measures to ensure equitable opportunity.
["equitable advancement","transparent assessment","accessible opportunity"]
Women mathematicians, scientists, and leaders have repeatedly had contributions attributed to male colleagues or undervalued despite superior performance—a pattern meritocracy frameworks often fail to address.
Complete word intelligence in one call. Free tier — 50 lookups/day.